Conlon Nancarrow (1912 - 1997) – Orchestral, Chamber and Piano Music
Continuum, Cheryl Seltzer, Joel Sachs
Musicmasters 7068-2-C, 1991
01. Piece No. 1 for Small Orchestra [06:56]
02. Toccata for Violin and Player Piano [01:29]
03. Prelude and Blues [03:17]
03. Prelude and Blues [03:17]
04. Study No. 15 [01:07]
05. Tango? [02:45]
06. Sonatina for Piano - Presto [01:23]
07. Sonatina for Piano - Moderato [01:44]
08. Sonatina for Piano - Allegro Molto [01:29]
09. Trio [02:38]
10. String Quartet No. 1 - Allegro Molto [02:37]
11. String Quartet No. 1 - Andante Moderato [03:12]
12. String Quartet No. 1 - Prestissimo [04:41]
13. Piece No. 2 for Small Orchestra [10:24]
Continuum
Cheryl Seltzer, Joel Sachs: Piano
Joel Sachs: Conductor
Joel Sachs: Conductor
________________________________________________________
• Review by Discophage, published on Amazon.com:
Recorded in 1989, this is the original 1991 release, by Musicmasters, of a CD that was recently reissued by Naxos and is available cheaper in that form. It is a fascinating addition to our knowledge of Nancarrow, as it gathers most of the (few) pieces he wrote for "normal" instruments, e.g. live performers, as opposed to the mechanical player piano for which he belatedly became so famous. Other than, perforce, the pieces he composed subsequently to the present recording (such as the Canons for Ursula Oppens or the third String Quartet), absent are the two remaining movements of the early (1942) Trio for Clarinet, Bassoon and Piano whose first movement is featured here: they were considered lost and were rediscovered shortly after the recording was made.
Piece No. 1 for Small Orchestra dates from 1943 and, in its perky orchestration and dynamic rhythms, I hear whiffs of Milhaud (Saudades do Brasil comes to mind at 2:50) and Weill. Likewise the Trio movement has the bounce and verve of Milhaud - but these two compositions are hardly essential and typical Nancarrow. They are short, too (7' and 2'30 respectively).
The Toccata for Violin and Player Piano is apparently the odd-piece out here in its use of the mechanical piano. In fact, it was first written (in 1935) for "normal" piano but some of the repeated notes in the piano part appeared unplayable, so Nancarrow made a piano roll transcription, and this is what is played here. It is a dazzling, and all-too-short tour de force, with the customary demented boogie-woogie from the piano, and a violin part that first seems to remember Bartok but then just tries to hang in there, attempting to emulate the piano. Violinist Mia Wu doesn't play with a particularly silky tone, but it hardly matters in that music. Unfortunately we are not told on whose and which player piano it was recorded - while retaining a wonderful honky-tonk flavor it sounds more mellow, not as brittle as the one of Nancarrow used for the Wergo 1988 recording of the complete Studies.
In the 1935 "Prelude" and "Blues" the fingers [from] Cheryl Seltzer are no match for the machine (which can be heard on the fascinating transcriptions made by Nancarrow and now available from Other Minds on a disc called Conlon Nancarrow: Lost Works, Last Works), but for human appendixes they are superbly fleet, lithe and muscular, much more than the teutonically heavy-handed Henck (and much better recorded too) on Piano Music by Nancarrow and Antheil. The 1943 Sonatina was first written for piano but appeared to be unplayable as such. Here too, Nancarrow made a transcription for player piano, just to be able to hear the piece (all these informations come from the fascinating Other Minds disc mentioned above). It was also later transcribed for piano four-hands by Yvar Mikhashoff, and this version Nancarrow reportedly came to prefer. It is the one played here, and it sounds more mellow than with the player piano, not only because of the slower tempo, but also because of the sound of the grand piano as opposed to the brittle, honky-tonk upright instrument of Nancarrow. The middle blues comes out more bluesy, but Nancarrow's characteristic terraced dynamics don't register as well as on the mechanical instrument. MDG is in the process of recording Nancarrows piano rolls adapted to a modern grand piano, and if they ever come around to the Sonatina, maybe we'll get the best of both worlds. Yet as it is, it is perfectly valid and fun in its own right. Another Mikhashoff transcription for piano four-hands it that of the original player piano Study #15, one that is accessible to live performers. It is a tribute to Joël Sachs' and Cheryl Seltzer's dazzling virtuosity that they do match the machine here.
When available, it is quite fascinating to compare these "live" performances to the transcriptions Nancarrow made for the player piano as documented on the Other Minds disc, and the two are really complementary. Nancarrow made such a transcription for the two outer movements of the 1st String Quartet. The difference is not only the obvious one of timbre, but also, once more, of tempo. One understands what Nancarrow had in his "mind's ear" when composing these pieces and hence, why he grew dissatisfied with human performers. The String Quartet played on four strings sounds like, well, just any other string quartet, one that possibly Milhaud (the dynamic bounce, the polytonal impression) or Krenek (the stern canons) and many other 20th century composers of mildly modernist ilk might have written. It its player piano transcription, it sounds like a dazzling, demented study for machine-keyboard.
After Nancarrow was discovered by the wider music world in the early '80s, he was persuaded to return to composing for "live" instruments. One of such pieces was the Piece for Small Orchestra No. 2. Not surprisingly, the piano features prominently, especially in a middle off-beat cadenza against jazzy double bass pizzicati (4:27). Overall it is fascinating and slightly jarring to hear all the characteristics of a Nancarrow player piano Study donning orchestral colors - it sounds in fact like the orchestration of a Study and again it is telling that Nancarrow transcribed the second part (starting at 5:50) for player piano (Study #50). But where the player piano has greyer colors and a mechanical and almost abstract quality, the orchestral colors highlight its simple theme of almost coplandesque, prairie-style contour (rising and descending minor thirds that in the transcription are hardly distinguishable from the surrounding activity), whose powerful crescendo give it a surprising "American Epic" quality, offset by the bustling activity of its inner fillings.
The only regret one can have is that each piece individually is so short, as well as the disc overall (44:36).
Piece No. 1 for Small Orchestra dates from 1943 and, in its perky orchestration and dynamic rhythms, I hear whiffs of Milhaud (Saudades do Brasil comes to mind at 2:50) and Weill. Likewise the Trio movement has the bounce and verve of Milhaud - but these two compositions are hardly essential and typical Nancarrow. They are short, too (7' and 2'30 respectively).
The Toccata for Violin and Player Piano is apparently the odd-piece out here in its use of the mechanical piano. In fact, it was first written (in 1935) for "normal" piano but some of the repeated notes in the piano part appeared unplayable, so Nancarrow made a piano roll transcription, and this is what is played here. It is a dazzling, and all-too-short tour de force, with the customary demented boogie-woogie from the piano, and a violin part that first seems to remember Bartok but then just tries to hang in there, attempting to emulate the piano. Violinist Mia Wu doesn't play with a particularly silky tone, but it hardly matters in that music. Unfortunately we are not told on whose and which player piano it was recorded - while retaining a wonderful honky-tonk flavor it sounds more mellow, not as brittle as the one of Nancarrow used for the Wergo 1988 recording of the complete Studies.
In the 1935 "Prelude" and "Blues" the fingers [from] Cheryl Seltzer are no match for the machine (which can be heard on the fascinating transcriptions made by Nancarrow and now available from Other Minds on a disc called Conlon Nancarrow: Lost Works, Last Works), but for human appendixes they are superbly fleet, lithe and muscular, much more than the teutonically heavy-handed Henck (and much better recorded too) on Piano Music by Nancarrow and Antheil. The 1943 Sonatina was first written for piano but appeared to be unplayable as such. Here too, Nancarrow made a transcription for player piano, just to be able to hear the piece (all these informations come from the fascinating Other Minds disc mentioned above). It was also later transcribed for piano four-hands by Yvar Mikhashoff, and this version Nancarrow reportedly came to prefer. It is the one played here, and it sounds more mellow than with the player piano, not only because of the slower tempo, but also because of the sound of the grand piano as opposed to the brittle, honky-tonk upright instrument of Nancarrow. The middle blues comes out more bluesy, but Nancarrow's characteristic terraced dynamics don't register as well as on the mechanical instrument. MDG is in the process of recording Nancarrows piano rolls adapted to a modern grand piano, and if they ever come around to the Sonatina, maybe we'll get the best of both worlds. Yet as it is, it is perfectly valid and fun in its own right. Another Mikhashoff transcription for piano four-hands it that of the original player piano Study #15, one that is accessible to live performers. It is a tribute to Joël Sachs' and Cheryl Seltzer's dazzling virtuosity that they do match the machine here.
When available, it is quite fascinating to compare these "live" performances to the transcriptions Nancarrow made for the player piano as documented on the Other Minds disc, and the two are really complementary. Nancarrow made such a transcription for the two outer movements of the 1st String Quartet. The difference is not only the obvious one of timbre, but also, once more, of tempo. One understands what Nancarrow had in his "mind's ear" when composing these pieces and hence, why he grew dissatisfied with human performers. The String Quartet played on four strings sounds like, well, just any other string quartet, one that possibly Milhaud (the dynamic bounce, the polytonal impression) or Krenek (the stern canons) and many other 20th century composers of mildly modernist ilk might have written. It its player piano transcription, it sounds like a dazzling, demented study for machine-keyboard.
After Nancarrow was discovered by the wider music world in the early '80s, he was persuaded to return to composing for "live" instruments. One of such pieces was the Piece for Small Orchestra No. 2. Not surprisingly, the piano features prominently, especially in a middle off-beat cadenza against jazzy double bass pizzicati (4:27). Overall it is fascinating and slightly jarring to hear all the characteristics of a Nancarrow player piano Study donning orchestral colors - it sounds in fact like the orchestration of a Study and again it is telling that Nancarrow transcribed the second part (starting at 5:50) for player piano (Study #50). But where the player piano has greyer colors and a mechanical and almost abstract quality, the orchestral colors highlight its simple theme of almost coplandesque, prairie-style contour (rising and descending minor thirds that in the transcription are hardly distinguishable from the surrounding activity), whose powerful crescendo give it a surprising "American Epic" quality, offset by the bustling activity of its inner fillings.
The only regret one can have is that each piece individually is so short, as well as the disc overall (44:36).


13 comments :
CD, FLAC, img, cue, scans
https://mega.nz/#!o2IhXK5a!ELxN38ihT1J8mW3qyJCX0bOR41BNmH_RNgI7qsi2WIA
PW: thewolf5th
Very nice - did not know about this release.
Thank you!
this should be a interesting listen! Thank you!
Listening to Nancarrow, for which my hearty thanks, gives me a chance to raise the subject of Silvestre Revueltas. I just heard his amazing Varese-like "Equinas." Since you have never posted music by this great Mexican modernist, could you please do so now. Perhaps you even have Carlos Surinach's extraordinary 1956 LP, made for MGM, of Revueltas' music. As for "Equinas," there is only one recording that I know of--and it has both the 1931 and 1933 versions. If you haven't heard this work, I think you will be impressed by Revueltas feeling for sonority. It's "Arcana" from south of the border. Thanks for this blog. I still owe you an immense debt of gratitude for introducing me to Cornelius Cardew and Harrison Birtwhistle.
Just a bunch more stuff to say thank you for...
Thanks!
Greetings and thank you for this - I used to own this stellar recording but lost it whilst moving - never got around to importing the disc so I'm quite grateful! ~Regards
I've just found your blog, kindly indicated by Ernst. What a gift. Hugely appreciated; life-enhancing.
You're welcome, guys. It's great to know you enjoyed the post.
@Ernst Grgo Nebhuth: Let me thank you for your many posts on Inconstant Sol, especially the Cecil Taylor stuff. And thanks to all the contributors there as well.
And yes, we're all indebted to v. and the wolf5th for this wonderful oasis.
Tech. info: there is no active link.
Would it be possible to have a new link, please?
Thanks
S.
>S1B8 said...
>Would it be possible to have a new link, please?
Probably you didn't read my comment here, where you asked for reupload:
https://wolf5th.blogspot.com/2018/02/friedrich-cerha-string-quartets-1-3.html
In case you didn't notice, under the main body of each post there is field "Posted by ...", in this case it is"
Posted by Ausklang at Sunday, March 31, 2019
So, I've lost communication means with Ausklang some time ago and can't renew Ausklang's offline links. Sorry about that. Additional tip: there is my comment above, confirmed that: v. said... Tech. info: there is no active link. December 1, 2022 at 6:51 AM
Hi, I didn't receive any notification and I stumbled upon this message totally by chance.
I'm sorry for replying so late.
I understand, thank you for the patience and for the beautiful music you've been sharing.
S.
Post a Comment